Cardiac magnetic resonance outperforms echocardiography to predict subsequent implantable cardioverter defibrillator therapies in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients

Front Cardiovasc Med. 2023 Feb 3:10:991307. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2023.991307. eCollection 2023.

Abstract

Background: Implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICD) are effective as a primary prevention measure of ventricular tachyarrhythmias in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and depressed left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). The implications of using cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) instead of echocardiography (Echo) to assess LVEF prior to the indication of ICD in this setting are unknown.

Materials and methods: We evaluated 52 STEMI patients (56.6 ± 11 years, 88.5% male) treated with ICD in primary prevention who underwent echocardiography and CMR prior to ICD implantation. ICD implantation was indicated based on the presence of heart failure and depressed LVEF (≤ 35%) by echocardiography, CMR, or both. Prediction of ICD therapies (ICD-T) during follow-up by echocardiography and CMR before ICD implantation was assessed.

Results: Compared to echocardiography, LVEF was lower by cardiac CMR (30.2 ± 9% vs. 37.4 ± 7.6%, p < 0.001). LVEF ≤ 35% was detected in 24 patients (46.2%) by Echo and in 42 (80.7%) by CMR. During a mean follow-up of 6.1 ± 4.2 years, 10 patients received appropriate ICD-T (3.16 ICD-T per 100 person-years): 5 direct shocks to treat very fast ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation, 3 effective antitachycardia pacing (ATP) for treatment of ventricular tachycardia, and 2 ineffective ATP followed by shock to treat ventricular tachycardia. Echo-LVEF ≤ 35% correctly predicted ICD-T in 4/10 (40%) patients and CMR-LVEF ≤ 35% in 10/10 (100%) patients. CMR-LVEF improved on Echo-LVEF for predicting ICD-T (area under the curve: 0.76 vs. 0.48, p = 0.04).

Conclusion: In STEMI patients treated with ICD, assessment of LVEF by CMR outperforms Echo-LVEF to predict the subsequent use of appropriate ICD therapies.

Keywords: cardiac magnetic resonance; implantable cardioverter-defibrillator; left ventricular ejection fraction; myocardial infarction; ventricular tachyarrhythmias.

Grants and funding

This work was supported by “Instituto de Salud Carlos III” and “Fondo Europeo de Desarrollo Regional (FEDER)” (grant numbers PI20/00637, CIBERCV16/11/00486, a postgraduate contract FI18/00320 to CR-N, and CM21/00175 to VM-G), Conselleria de Educación—Generalitat Valenciana (PROMETEO/2021/008), and Sociedad Española de Cardiología (Grant SEC/FEC-INV-CLI 21/024). JG acknowledges financial support from the “Agencia Estatal de Investigación” (grant FJC2020-043981-I/AEI/10.13039/501100011033).