The negation-induced forgetting effect remains even after reducing associative interference

Cognition. 2023 Jun:235:105412. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2023.105412. Epub 2023 Feb 20.

Abstract

Recent research has provided evidence that negation processing recruits the neural network of response inhibition (de Vega et al., 2016). Furthermore, inhibition mechanisms also play a role in human memory. In two experiments, we aimed to assess how producing a negation in a verification task may impact long-term memory. Experiment 1 used the same memory paradigm as Mayo et al. (2014), consisting of several phases: first, reading a story describing the activity of a protagonist, immediately followed by a "yes-no" verification task, then a distractive task, and finally an incidental free recall test. Consistent with the previous results, negated sentences were recalled worse than affirmed sentences. Yet, there is a possible confounding between the effect of negation itself and the associative interference of two conflicting predicates - the original and the modified one - in negative trials. To avoid this, Experiment 2 modified the paradigm by including a story describing the activities of two protagonists in such a way that the affirmed and denied verification sentences had the same content, and only differed in the attribution of a specific event to the correct or wrong protagonist. The negation-induced forgetting effect was still powerful, while controlling for potential contaminating variables. Our finding would support that the impaired long-term memory could be ascribed to reusing the inhibitory mechanism of negation.

Keywords: Associative interference; Forgetting; Inhibition; Memory; Negation.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Humans
  • Inhibition, Psychological
  • Language*
  • Memory, Long-Term
  • Mental Recall*