Reliability of species detection in 16S microbiome analysis: Comparison of five widely used pipelines and recommendations for a more standardized approach

PLoS One. 2023 Feb 16;18(2):e0280870. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0280870. eCollection 2023.

Abstract

The use of NGS-based testing of the bacterial microbiota is often impeded by inconsistent or non-reproducible results, especially when applying different analysis pipelines and reference databases. We investigated five frequently used software packages by submitting the same monobacterial datasets to them, representing the V1-2 and the V3-4 regions of the 16S-rRNA gene of 26 well characterized strains, which were sequenced by the Ion Torrent™ GeneStudio S5 system. The results obtained were divergent and calculations of relative abundance did not yield the expected 100%. We investigated these inconsistencies and were able to attribute them to failures either of the pipelines themselves or of the reference databases they rely on. On the basis of these findings, we recommend certain standards which should help to render microbiome testing more consistent and reproducible, and thus useful in clinical practice.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Bacteria / genetics
  • Base Sequence
  • High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing* / methods
  • Microbiota* / genetics
  • RNA, Ribosomal, 16S / genetics
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Sequence Analysis, DNA / methods

Substances

  • RNA, Ribosomal, 16S

Grants and funding

This work was funded by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation) – Projektnummer 395357507 – SFB 1371.It was also funded by the Bavarian Ministry of Science and the Arts in the framework of the Bavarian Research Network "New Strategies Against Multi-Resistant Pathogens by Means of Digital Networking-bayresq.net" Förderkennzeichen: Kap. 1528 TG 83. The work also received financial support was supported by the Society for Promotion of Quality Assurance in Medical Laboratories e. V. (INSTAND e.V., Düsseldorf, Germany)The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.