Background: Ulcerative colitis [UC] assessment still requires ileocolonoscopy [IC]. Intestinal ultrasound [IUS] has emerged as a non-invasive assessment tool, and the Milan Ultrasound Criteria [MUC] score has been validated to estimate and grade UC disease activity. Recently, hand-held IUS [HHIUS] has been used in several clinical settings, but data about its use in UC are limited. We aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of HHIUS compared with conventional IUS in detecting UC extension and activity.
Patients and methods: From November 2021 to September 2022, we prospectively enrolled UC patients afferent to our third-level IBD Unit for IC evaluation. Patients underwent IC, HHIUS, and IUS. Ultrasound activity was defined by MUC >6.2, and endoscopic activity was defined by a Mayo endoscopic score [MES] >1. Cohen's k test was applied to test the concordance between IUS-MUC and HHIUS-MUC after MUC dichotomisation [MUC >6.2, yes/no].
Results: In all, 86 patients with UC were enrolled. No significant difference was recorded between IUS and HHIUS at the per-segment extension [p = N.S.], and both procedures were comparable in terms of results of bowel wall thickness [BWT] and bowel wall stratification [BWS] assessment [p = N.S.]. IUS and HHIUS displayed excellent agreement when the MUC score system was applied [k = 0.86, p <0.01].
Conclusion: Hand-held intestinal ultrasound and IUS are comparable in UC extension definition and MUC evaluation. HHIUS could be reliable for detecting disease activity and estimating its extension, providing close monitoring. It also represents a non-invasive, easily practicable investigation, allowing immediate medical decisions with significant time and cost advantages.
Keywords: IBD; Ulcerative colitis; endoscopy; hand-held sonography; ultrasonography.
© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of European Crohn’s and Colitis Organisation. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.