Digital financial inclusion and environmental entrepreneurship: evolution of state legal environmental responsibility in China

Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 Apr;30(17):50309-50318. doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-25730-1. Epub 2023 Feb 15.

Abstract

This investigation attempts to look at how digital finance and environmental taxes affect environmental entrepreneurship. We have used the QARDL model to evaluate the short- and long-run estimations. The main findings of the QARDL model confirm that digital finance is vital in promoting the environmental entrepreneurship model in the long run. In contrast, in the short run, digital finance does not significantly impact environmental entrepreneurship. Moreover, environment-related taxes, environmental innovations, and economic development promote environmental entrepreneurship in the long run across most quantiles. However, in the short run, environment-related taxes and economic development do not exert any significant impact on environmental entrepreneurship in almost all quantiles, while environmental innovation promotes environmental entrepreneurship in most quantiles. Further, asymmetric effects of digital finance (ATM and debit card), environment-related taxes, environmental innovations, and economic development are confirmed in the long run; in the short run, asymmetric effects are observed in the case of environmental innovation in both the models. Following the results, we suggest that the public and private sectors should do more financing to promote ecopreneurship in society. Moreover, more taxes should be imposed on entrepreneurs who do not adopt green practices.

Keywords: Digital finance; Environmental entrepreneurship; Environmental taxes.

MeSH terms

  • China
  • Economic Development
  • Entrepreneurship*
  • Private Sector*
  • Taxes