Managing Families' Expectations in the Coronial Jurisdiction: Barriers to Enacting an Ethic of Care

J Law Med. 2022 Dec;29(4):1040-1051.

Abstract

The coronial jurisdiction is different in function, character and procedure to most other legal processes in Australia, being inquisitorial rather than adversarial. It is also, by virtue of its focus on the circumstances of death, situated at the intersection of trauma and grief on the one hand, and legal exploration and evidence-gathering, on the other. For families a coronial investigation offers the potential for resolution about a death, but it can also exacerbate grief and trauma, particularly in the public forum of an inquest. This article utilises interviews with legal professionals engaged in the coronial jurisdiction to explore their understanding of the issues that impact upon families during a death investigation. Our findings indicate that an ethics of care is evident in the court but that this remains contingent on adequate resourcing of the sector, and that this is increasingly the case as the jurisdiction becomes more specialised.

Keywords: coroner; families; inquest; therapeutic jurisprudence.

MeSH terms

  • Australia
  • Coroners and Medical Examiners*
  • Humans
  • Motivation*
  • Social Control, Formal