Three different types of sunitinib-loaded (SUN-loaded) nanocarriers were compared, aiming at the topical treatment of corneal neovascularization (CNV): polymeric nanospheres (NS), liposomes (LIP), and solid lipid nanoparticles (SLN). Three out of eleven formulations prepared for an optimization study - the best SUN-loaded nanocarrier of each assessed type (NS, LIP, and SLN) - were selected, based on their size, polydispersity index (PdI), drug load (DL), and encapsulation efficiency (EE). These three optimal formulations were further characterized by nanoparticle tracking analysis (NTA), electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) spectroscopy, and zeta potential. In vitro SUN release profiles were obtained for the optimal formulations, along with ex vivo corneal permeability/retention studies, and ocular tolerance assays, namely: the bovine corneal opacity and permeability (BCOP) assay, the HET-CAM test (hen's egg test - chorioallantoic membrane), and hemolytic potential (HP) assay. None of the optimal formulations exhibited toxicity or potential for ocular irritation. SLN showed higher surface fluidity, drug release more suitable for topical ocular applications, besides greater SUN corneal retention. Our results suggest that SLN are the best CNV-targeting SUN-loaded nanocarriers for clinical translation when compared to their NS and LIP analogues.
Keywords: Corneal neovascularization; Liposomes; Polymeric nanospheres; Pre-clinical safety; Solid lipid nanoparticles.
Copyright © 2023 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.