Aspiration prevention surgeries: a review

Respir Res. 2023 Feb 6;24(1):43. doi: 10.1186/s12931-023-02354-0.

Abstract

Background: Severe dysphagia can cause intractable pneumonia and lead to life-threatening conditions. Intractable aspiration can occur despite medical management for aspiration prevention. Surgical intervention is indicated for intractable aspiration to prevent potentially life-threatening complications. Since the 1970s, several surgical treatments to prevent aspiration have been reported, and various aspiration prevention surgeries have been introduced, but little is known about them or their benefits. This is a review of the types of aspiration prevention surgery, with the aim of increasing aspiration prevention surgery awareness and their clinical outcomes among medical professionals, which will guide the choices of aspiration prevention surgeries for patients with intractable aspiration.

Main body: Aspiration prevention surgeries can be categorized into three according to their approaches: removal of the larynx, altering the structure of the trachea, and closure of the larynx. Aspiration prevention surgeries to remove the larynx include total and central-part laryngectomy. Aspiration prevention surgeries to alter the structure of the trachea include tracheoesophageal diversion, laryngotracheal separation, and the tracheal flap method. Surgeries to close the larynx can be divided into supraglottic laryngeal closure, glottic laryngeal closure, and subglottic laryngeal closure. Aspiration prevention surgeries prevent aspiration and increase oral intake in 50-80% of patients. Most patients lose vocal function after aspiration prevention surgeries; however, some patients who have undergone total laryngectomy or laryngotracheal separation restored their speech function through tracheoesophageal puncture and use of voice prosthesis. Postoperative suture failure is frequent after epiglottic flap closure and total laryngectomy but rare after central-part laryngectomy, laryngotracheal separation, glottic closure, and subglottic closure. Furthermore, aspiration prevention surgeries improve the quality of life of patients and their caregivers by decreasing suctioning frequency.

Conclusions: In this review, we described the history and development of aspiration prevention surgeries. Medical professionals need to continually improve their knowledge and skills to facilitate appropriate aspiration prevention surgeries according to patient condition.

Keywords: Aspiration pneumonia; Aspiration prevention surgery; Dysphagia; Surgery; Swallowing.

Publication types

  • Review

MeSH terms

  • Humans
  • Laryngectomy / adverse effects
  • Larynx* / surgery
  • Pneumonia, Aspiration* / etiology
  • Pneumonia, Aspiration* / prevention & control
  • Quality of Life
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Trachea / surgery