Relevant factors of posterior mandible lingual plate perforation during immediate implant placement: a virtual implant placement study using CBCT

BMC Oral Health. 2023 Feb 6;23(1):76. doi: 10.1186/s12903-022-02696-z.

Abstract

Background: To explore the influence of cross-sectional type and morphological parameters at the mandibular molar sites on lingual plate perforation (LPP) during the immediate implant placement (IIP).

Methods: 181 implants were virtually placed in the mandibular molar sites on the cone beam computed tomography (CBCT). Each cross-section of the implantation site was divided into the Undercut (U)/Parallel (P)/Convex (C) types. Morphologically relevant parameters were measured on the cross-sections, including width of the upper end (Wb), width of the lower end (Wc), vertical height (V), angle between the natural crown axis and the alveolar bone axis (∠β), LC depth (LCD), LC height, and angle between the horizontal line and the line connecting the most prominent point and the most concave point of lingual plate (∠α). Besides, the distance from the end of the virtual implant and the lingual bone plate of the cross-section (DIL) was calculated. Relationships between all the morphologically relevant parameters and the DIL were further analyzed.

Results: A total of 77 (42.5%) cross-sections were classified as U-type, which was the most common one, accounting for 63% of the second molar regions. All LPP cases and most of the nearly LPP (87.9%) cases occurred at the U-type cross-sections, and the relationship between the DIL and the morphological parameters can be expressed by a multivariate linear equation.

Conclusions: The occurrence rate of U-type cross-sections in the second molar region was very high, and the risk of LPP should be considered during IIP. Except for the U-type, significant large LCD, small Wc, and large ∠β were the important relevant factors. CBCT and multivariate linear equations could help to assess the LPP risk and provide a reference for implant placement design pre-surgery.

Keywords: Complication; Cone-beam computed tomography; Immediate implant placement; Mandible; Molar.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Cone-Beam Computed Tomography / methods
  • Cross-Sectional Studies
  • Dental Implantation, Endosseous / adverse effects
  • Dental Implantation, Endosseous / methods
  • Dental Implants* / adverse effects
  • Humans
  • Mandible / anatomy & histology
  • Mandible / diagnostic imaging
  • Mandible / surgery
  • Spiral Cone-Beam Computed Tomography*

Substances

  • Dental Implants