Background: Fronto-orbital advancement and remodeling (FOAR) is among the most common surgical approaches for unicoronal craniosynostosis (UCS), although some data demonstrate failure to achieve long-term aesthetic normalcy, leading some to seek alternative treatment paradigms such as fronto-orbital distraction osteogenesis (FODO). This study compares long-term aesthetic outcomes of patients with UCS treated with FOAR and FODO.
Methods: Twenty patients (four males) with non-syndromic UCS presenting to our institution and undergoing distraction were compared to a matched cohort of 20 patients (six males) undergoing FOAR. Clinical photographs and ImageJ were used to quantify periorbital anatomy including palpebral fissures, pupil-to-brow distance (PTB), and margin-reflex distance (MRD1) in pixels. Whitaker classification was blindly assigned by craniofacial surgeons.
Results: Photogrammetric analysis and Mann-Whitney U tests demonstrated significantly improved postoperative symmetry in distraction patients for palpebral width (p = 0.020), MRD1 (p = 0.045), and canthal tilt (p = 0.010). Average Whitaker classification scores between FOAR (1.94) and distraction (1.79) cohorts were similar (p = 0.374).
Conclusions: UCS patients demonstrated significant postoperative improvements in periorbital symmetry, with distraction patients demonstrating superior results in palpebral width and canthal tilt. FOAR and FODO patients achieved similar Whitaker classification scores. These cohorts will be followed until craniofacial maturity prior to making any definitive conclusions.
Keywords: Aesthetic outcomes; Distraction osteogenesis; Fronto-orbital advancement; Unicoronal craniosynostosis.
© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.