Attitudes, Clinical Practices, and Perceived Advocacy Needs of Professionals With Interests in Personality Disorders

J Pers Disord. 2023 Feb;37(1):1-15. doi: 10.1521/pedi.2023.37.1.1.

Abstract

Experts in personality disorders (PDs) generally prefer dimensional diagnostic systems to categorical ones, but less is known about experts' attitudes toward personality pathology diagnoses in adolescents, and little is known about public health shortfalls and advocacy needs and how these might differ geographically. To fill these gaps, the International Society for the Study of Personality Disorders surveyed 248 professionals with interests in PDs about their attitudes toward different diagnostic systems for adults and adolescents, their PD-related clinical practices, and perceived advocacy needs in their area. Results suggested that dimensional diagnostic systems are preferable to categorical and that skepticism about personality pathology in adolescents may not be warranted. The most pressing advocacy need was the increased availability of PD-related services, but many other needs were identified. Results provide a blueprint for advocacy and suggest ways that professional societies can collaborate with public health bodies to expand the reach of PD expertise and services.

Keywords: diagnosis; evidence-based practice; personality pathology; public health needs; treatment accessibility.

MeSH terms

  • Adolescent
  • Adult
  • Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders
  • Humans
  • Personality Disorders* / diagnosis
  • Personality*
  • Surveys and Questionnaires