Scaling patterns of body plans differ among squirrel ecotypes

PeerJ. 2023 Jan 25:11:e14800. doi: 10.7717/peerj.14800. eCollection 2023.

Abstract

Body size is often hypothesized to facilitate or constrain morphological diversity in the cranial, appendicular, and axial skeletons. However, how overall body shape scales with body size (i.e., body shape allometry) and whether these scaling patterns differ between ecological groups remains poorly investigated. Here, we test whether and how the relationships between body shape, body size, and limb lengths differ among species with different locomotor specializations, and describe the underlying morphological components that contribute to body shape evolution among squirrel (Sciuridae) ecotypes. We quantified the body size and shape of 87 squirrel species from osteological specimens held at museum collections. Using phylogenetic comparative methods, we first found that body shape and its underlying morphological components scale allometrically with body size, but these allometric patterns differ among squirrel ecotypes: chipmunks and gliding squirrels exhibited more elongate bodies with increasing body sizes whereas ground squirrels exhibited more robust bodies with increasing body size. Second, we found that only ground squirrels exhibit a relationship between forelimb length and body shape, where more elongate species exhibit relatively shorter forelimbs. Third, we found that the relative length of the ribs and elongation or shortening of the thoracic region contributes the most to body shape evolution across squirrels. Overall, our work contributes to the growing understanding of mammalian body shape evolution and how it is influenced by body size and locomotor ecology, in this case from robust subterranean to gracile gliding squirrels.

Keywords: Axial skeleton; Body elongation; Ecomorphology; Evolutionary allometry; Thoracolumbar vertebrae.

Publication types

  • Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Animals
  • Biological Evolution*
  • Body Size
  • Ecotype
  • Phylogeny
  • Sciuridae* / anatomy & histology

Grants and funding

Tate J. Linden was supported by the American Museum of Natural History REU program; Abigail E. Burtner was supported by the American Museum of Natural History REU program, the Mary Gates Endowment, and the American Society of Mammalogists Grant-in-Aid of Research Award; Johannah Rickman and Annika McFeely were supported by a National Science Foundation Postdoctoral Research Fellowship REU Program; Sharlene E. Santana was supported by National Science Foundation IOS-2017738; and Chris J. Law was supported by National Science Foundation DBI-1906248 and DBI–2128146, the Gerstner Family Foundation and the Richard Gilder Graduate School at the American Museum of Natural History, an Iuvo Postdoctoral Award at the University of Washington, and a University of Texas Early Career Provost Fellowship. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.