Commentary: The Boy Who Cried Wolf or Cassandra? A Consideration of the Correct Characterization of Critics of Neoliberal Reforms to the English NHS

Int J Soc Determinants Health Health Serv. 2023 Jan 4;53(2):27551938221148370. doi: 10.1177/27551938221148370. Online ahead of print.

Abstract

Peter Roderick and Allyson Pollock's article, "Dismantling the National Health Service in England," provides a history of the market incrementalism that has dominated UK government policy pertaining to the English National Health System (NHS), in recent decades. It also contains an analysis of the latest statute to reform the English NHS, namely the Health and Care Act 2022. It is often argued that the concerns-for example, about privatization-of those who critique neoliberal reforms to the English NHS are misplaced. I highlight that such neoliberal reforms have increased the proportion of the budget of the English NHS that is being diverted to private providers. Consequently, I aver that the term privatization accurately describes what has been occurring within the English NHS. I contend that the arguments of those who deny or downplay the privatization of the English NHS are indicative of some of the ideological strategies that the sociologist John B. Thompson identified. My commentary suggests that the concerns of critics of neoliberal reforms to the English NHS, such as Roderick and Pollock, are not misplaced and that more heed should be given to their analyses and warnings.

Keywords: English NHS; ideology; market incrementalism; privatization.

Publication types

  • Review