Background: Although current guidelines didn't support the routine use of furosemide in oliguric acute kidney injury (AKI) management, some patients may benefit from furosemide administration at an early stage. We aimed to develop an explainable machine learning (ML) model to differentiate between furosemide-responsive (FR) and furosemide-unresponsive (FU) oliguric AKI.
Methods: From Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care-IV (MIMIC-IV) and eICU Collaborative Research Database (eICU-CRD), oliguric AKI patients with urine output (UO) < 0.5 ml/kg/h for the first 6 h after ICU admission and furosemide infusion ≥ 40 mg in the following 6 h were retrospectively selected. The MIMIC-IV cohort was used in training a XGBoost model to predict UO > 0.65 ml/kg/h during 6-24 h succeeding the initial 6 h for assessing oliguria, and it was validated in the eICU-CRD cohort. We compared the predictive performance of the XGBoost model with the traditional logistic regression and other ML models.
Results: 6897 patients were included in the MIMIC-IV training cohort, with 2235 patients in the eICU-CRD validation cohort. The XGBoost model showed an AUC of 0.97 (95% CI: 0.96-0.98) for differentiating FR and FU oliguric AKI. It outperformed the logistic regression and other ML models in correctly predicting furosemide diuretic response, achieved 92.43% sensitivity (95% CI: 90.88-93.73%) and 95.12% specificity (95% CI: 93.51-96.3%).
Conclusion: A boosted ensemble algorithm can be used to accurately differentiate between patients who would and would not respond to furosemide in oliguric AKI. By making the model explainable, clinicians would be able to better understand the reasoning behind the prediction outcome and make individualized treatment.
Keywords: Oliguric acute kidney injury; XGBoost modeling; furosemide responsiveness; machine learning.