This article aimed to assess the efficacy of periodontal regenerative therapy (PRT) for treating periodontal intrabony defects in East Asians. The systematic review was performed according to the PRISMA guidelines. Literature searches on the PubMed and national medical journal databases, and representative clinical journals of the East Asians were performed on July 31, 2018. Randomized controlled trials, prospective case-control studies, retrospective analyses, and case series receiving regenerative procedures, including barrier membrane (BM) and enamel matrix derivative (EMD) applications with or without bone replacement graft (BRG), with follow-up periods of 6 and 12 months were evaluated. The outcome variables were probing depth (PD) reduction and clinical attachment level (CAL) gain. Twenty studies were included, of which eight were assessed for bias risk. Compared to open flap debridement, PD reduction and CAL gain were superior in all PRTs at both follow-up time points. BM or EMD alone showed equivalent outcomes at 6 months, and CAL gain appeared greater with BM alone at 12 months. BM with BRG showed inferior CAL gain relative to BM alone, but EMD with BRG showed superior CAL gain relative to EMD alone at 12 months. In conclusion, PRT showed improved regenerative outcomes compared with OFD in East Asians, while BM application appeared less efficient than in non-East Asians. BRG supplementation provided additional clinical benefits in EMD application.
Keywords: Asians; Bone substitutes; Dental enamel proteins; Guided tissue regeneration; Periodontal.
© 2022 Association for Dental Sciences of the Republic of China. Publishing services by Elsevier B.V.