Comparison of Point-of-Care and Laboratory Glycated Hemoglobin A1c and Its Relationship to Time-in-Range and Glucose Variability: A Real-World Study

Ayman Al Hayek; Wael M Alzahrani; Samia H Sobki; Abdulghani H Al-Saeed; Mohamed Al Dawish

doi:10.7759/cureus.33416

Comparison of Point-of-Care and Laboratory Glycated Hemoglobin A1c and Its Relationship to Time-in-Range and Glucose Variability: A Real-World Study

Cureus. 2023 Jan 5;15(1):e33416. doi: 10.7759/cureus.33416. eCollection 2023 Jan.

Authors

Ayman Al Hayek¹, Wael M Alzahrani¹, Samia H Sobki², Abdulghani H Al-Saeed¹, Mohamed Al Dawish¹

Affiliations

¹ Department of Endocrinology and Diabetes, Prince Sultan Military Medical City, Riyadh, SAU.
² Department of Clinical Chemistry, Saudi Society for Clinical Chemistry, Riyadh, SAU.

Abstract

Introduction The main objective of the current study was to perform a comparison of point-of-care testing for hemoglobin A1c (POCT-HbA1c) versus the standard laboratory method (Lab HbA1c) and their relationship to time-in-range (TIR) and glucose variability (GV) among patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) presented to the outpatient diabetes clinics. Methods This single-center cross-sectional study was carried out on diabetic patients (aged ≥14 years of both genders) who undergo routine follow-up at our institution and whose physicians ordered HbA1c analysis for routine care. The included patients were those using the intermittently scanned continuous glucose monitoring (isCGM) Abbott's FreeStyle Libre system for at least three months and regular CGM users with at least 70% use. Results We included 97 diabetic patients (41 female and 56 male), with a median age of 25 years (Interquartile range= 18) and a mean DM duration of 10.33±5.48 years. The mean values of Lab-HbA1c and POCT HbA1c were 8.82%±0.85% and 8.53%±0.89%, respectively. The TIR, time below range, and time above range were 33.47±14.38 minutes (47.78%±14.32%), 5.44±2.58 minutes (8.41%±4.42%), and 28.8±8.27 minutes (43.81%±13.22%), respectively. According to the Bland-Altman plot analysis, the POCT-HbA1c values are consistent with the standard Lab-HbA1c values (SD of bias= 0.55, and 95% CI= -0.78 to 1.4). The univariate linear regression analysis showed a statistically significant relationship between laboratory HbA1c and POCT HbA1c (R2= 0.637, p <0.001), TIR (R2= 0.406, p <0.001), and GV (R2= 0.048, p= 0.032). After adjusting for age, gender, disease duration, diabetes type, and percentage of sensor data in a multivariable linear regression model, the linear associations remained significant (all p < 0.05). Conclusion The current findings show that TIR and GV can be used as endpoints and valuable parameters for the therapy of DM.

Keywords: diabetes mellitus; glucose variability; laboratory hba1c; poct hba1c; saudi arabia; time-in-range.