Objectives: We assessed skeletal microstructure and stiffness in proton pump inhibitor (PPI) users compared to non-users with high resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography (HRpQCT) and microfinite element analysis (μFEA) and other modalities. Relationships between PPI dose/frequency and bone parameters were evaluated.
Methods: We cross-sectionally assessed skeletal health in 601 older (≥age 65 years) adults (130 PPI users and 471 non-users) participating in a multi-ethnic population-based study of aging.
Results: PPI users tended to have more comorbidities and take more medications than non-users. Female PPI users (n = 100) were more likely to be non-Caucasian, shorter with higher BMI, and more likely to have diabetes, lower physical activity and be using anti-depressants and thiazide diuretics compared to non-users (n = 302). Male PPI users (n = 30) were more likely to have liver disease than non-users (n = 169). In women, historical fractures (53.0 % vs. 43.4 %, p = 0.05) and falls (38 % vs. 26.8 %, p = 0.04) tended to be more frequent in PPI users compared to non-users. Number of falls was higher in women reporting daily rather than intermittent PPI use (1.8/year vs. 1.0/year, p < 0.001). In women, there were no differences in any HRpQCT or μFEA parameter. By HRpQCT, covariate-adjusted cortical volumetric bone density (Ct.vBMD) was 4.2 % lower in male PPI users vs. non-users at the tibia (p = 0.04), but this did not result in reduced stiffness. There were no other differences by HRpQCT at the tibia or radius.
Conclusions: PPI use was not associated with altered skeletal microstructure or stiffness in elderly men and women. The results do not support a relationship between PPI use and microstructure.
Keywords: Fracture; Microfinite element analysis; Microstructure; Proton pump inhibitor; Volumetric bone density.
Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.