Performance of discs, sensititre EUMDROXF microplates and MTS gradient strips for the determination of the susceptibility of multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa to cefiderocol

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate the performance of commercially available tests to determine the susceptibility of multidrug-resistant (MDR) clinical Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains to cefiderocol.

Methods: A collection of 150 clinical strains of P. aeruginosa resistant to ceftazidime, (MIC, Minimal Inhibitory Concentration, MIC > 8 mg/L) imipenem (MIC> 4 mg/L) and ceftolozane/tazobactam (MIC> 4/4 mg/L), isolated from 2015 to 2022 was selected. Cefiderocol susceptibility was determined in parallel (a) by disc diffusion using Mast, Oxoid and Liofilchem discs deposited on Mueller-Hinton agar batches from Bio-Rad, BioMérieux, Mast, Becton Dickinson, I2A and Oxoid; (b) by MIC gradient test strips (MTS) (Liofilchem); and (c) by EUMDROXF Sensititre microplates. MICs and inhibition zones were compared with the broth microdilution reference method (BMD) MICs.

Results: The MIC₅₀ and MIC₉₀ of cefiderocol were 1 mg/L and 8 mg/L by BMD, respectively, including 21.3% (32/150) resistant strains. None of the methods tested fulfilled acceptable criteria (essential agreement [EA] ≥ 90%; bias = ± 30%). Although the Sensititre EUMDROXF microplates overestimated MIC values (categorical agreement [CA] = 86.7% [130/150, 95% CI 80.3-91.2]; EA = 69.3% [104/150, 95% CI 61.6-76.2]; bias = 68.2%), MTS strips underestimated the MIC values for many strains (CA = 86.7%, 130/150, 95% CI 80.3-91.2; EA = 69.3%, 104/150, 95% CI 61.6-76.2; bias = -30.4%), classifying properly only 50% (16/32) of resistant strains. Finally, many cefiderocol-resistant strains were not identified by the disc method, although the CA ranged from 78.0% (117/150, 95% CI 70.7-83.0) to 89.3% (134/150, 95% IC 83.4-93.3) according to Mueller-Hinton agar batches.

Conclusion: Determination of cefiderocol susceptibility in MDR P. aeruginosa clinical strains by Sensititre EUMDROXF microplates is an alternative to the reference BMD method. However, MIC values ± 1 dilution apart from the breakpoint (2 mg/L) should be controlled by BMD whereas the use of MTS gradient strips is discouraged. Disc diffusion might be useful for screening, unfortunately many cefiderocol-resistant strains are not detected.

Keywords: Cefiderocol; Pseudomonas aeruginosa; Susceptibility testing.