Relationship Between C-reactive Protein-to-albumin Ratio Before and After Bowel Decompression and Prognosis in Acute Malignant Large Bowel Obstruction

Abstract

Background/aim: We investigated the relationship between prognosis and the necessity of decompression of large bowel obstruction (LBO) among patients with colorectal cancer admitted to the hospital in an emergency, as well as the correlation between prognosis and improvement in the C-reactive protein-to-albumin ratio (CAR) after decompression.

Patients and methods: Seventy-four patients admitted to the hospital between 2013 and 2021 in an emergency due to LBO were included. We examined perioperative clinicopathological factors, bowel decompression type, and prognosis.

Results: Of the 74 patients, 24 (32.4%) required bowel decompression. A higher percentage of patients who required bowel decompression had a colorectal obstruction scoring system (CROSS) score 0 (p<0.001) with higher frequency of nutritional disorders (p=0.063) than that in no bowel decompression-requiring patients. The 3-year-disease-free survival was 70.8% in the no decompression-requiring group and 26.9% in the bowel decompression group (p=0.007), while the 3-year-overall survival was 90.8% and 76.5%, respectively (p=0.001). The 3-year-disease-free survival was 49.2% in the improved CAR group and 0.0% in the non-improved CAR group (p=0.024), while the 3-year-overall survival was 91.7% and 56.3%, respectively (p=0.061).

Conclusion: The necessity of emergency decompression was associated with a poorer prognosis, compared to the no decompression-requiring group. Similarly, a CROSS score of 0 was an independent poor prognostic factor. Among patients who required emergency bowel decompression, those who showed improvement in CAR before and after decompression treatment had a better prognosis than those who did not.

Keywords: Bowel decompression; colorectal cancer; malignant large bowel obstruction; nutritional status; prognosis.