A new ranking index to identify the work-related psychosocial factors most impacting mental health: a cross-sectional study

BMJ Open. 2022 Dec 30;12(12):e046444. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-046444.

Abstract

Objectives: In modern professional life, mental health prevention and promotion have become a major challenge for decision-makers. Devising appropriate actions requires better understanding the role played by each work-related psychosocial factor (WPSF). The objective of this study was to present a relevant tool to hierarchise WPSFs that jointly takes into account their importance (impact on mental health) and their prevalence (the proportion of the population exposed to WPSF).

Design: A cross-sectional study was conducted in March 2018 among 3200 French workers which are representative of the French working population.

Setting: France.

Participants: Individuals aged 18-80 years who declared currently having a job (even a part-time job) whatever their occupation or status (employee or self-employed) were eligible. We excluded students, unemployed individuals, housewives/husbands and retired people. The mental health level was assessed using the General Health Questionnaire-28 and 44 items were gathered from theoretical models of WPSFs. We assessed two distinct multivariate methods for calculating WPSF importance: (1) weifila (weighted first last) method in a linear regression context and (2) random forests in a non-linear context. Both methods were adjusted on individual, health and job characteristics.

Results: The WPSF rankings obtained with the two methods to calculate importance are strongly consistent with each other (correlation coefficient=0.88). We highlighted nine WPSFs that are ranked high by both methods. In particular, irrespective of the chosen method, lack of communication, lack of social and hierarchy support and personal-professional life imbalance, emotional demands at work and dissatisfaction with the compensation received came out as top-ranking WPSFs.

Conclusions: A total of nine WPSFs were identified as key for decision-making. The easy-to-use tools we propose can help decision-makers identify priority WPSFs and design effective strategies to promote mental health in the workplace.

Keywords: epidemiology; mental health; public health; statistics & research methods.

MeSH terms

  • Cross-Sectional Studies
  • Employment
  • Humans
  • Mental Health*
  • Occupations
  • Surveys and Questionnaires
  • Workplace* / psychology