Analysis of forensic autopsy cases associated with epilepsy: Comparison between sudden unexpected death in epilepsy (SUDEP) and not-SUDEP groups

Xian Zhang; Jianhua Zhang; Jinming Wang; Donghua Zou; Zhengdong Li

doi:10.3389/fneur.2022.1077624

Analysis of forensic autopsy cases associated with epilepsy: Comparison between sudden unexpected death in epilepsy (SUDEP) and not-SUDEP groups

Front Neurol. 2022 Dec 9:13:1077624. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2022.1077624. eCollection 2022.

Authors

Xian Zhang¹, Jianhua Zhang², Jinming Wang², Donghua Zou², Zhengdong Li²

Affiliations

¹ Department of Cardiology, Kunshan Hospital of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine, Jiangsu, China.
² Shanghai Key Laboratory of Forensic Medicine, Academy of Forensic Science, Ministry of Justice, Shanghai, China.

Abstract

Background and aims: Epilepsy is a common and chronic neurological disorder characterized by seizures that increase the risk of mortality. SUDEP is the most common seizure-related category of death. The study aimed to evaluate the key characteristics between SUDEP and not-SUDEP death cases.

Methods: A retrospective study of forensic autopsy cases from 2002 to 2021, performed by the Academy of Forensic Science (Ministry of Justice, China), identified a total of 31 deaths associated with epilepsy. We compared the different characteristics between individuals who died of SUDEP (SUDEP group) and individuals with epilepsy died suddenly due to unrelated causes (not-SUDEP group).

Results and conclusions: 13 cases met the general accepted definition of SUDEP; and 18 cases were classified as not-SUDEP. The mean age of the not-SUDEP group was significantly higher than that of the SUDEP groups (p < 0.05) and there were more cases without a clear cause of epilepsy in the SUDEP group than in the not-SUDEP group (p < 0.05). Death position differed significantly between the two groups, with more cases dying in the prone position in the SUDEP group (p < 0.05). Complete autopsies were performed in 24 of the 31 cases. There were no significant differences in heart, lungs and brain weights, or in ventricular thickness (p > 0.05) between the SUDEP and not-SUDEP groups. In addition, compared to the not-SUDEP group, the SUDEP group featured a significantly more cases with coronary lesions (grades 1-3, p < 0.05). Neuropathological lesions were identified in 12 of the 13 SUDEP cases (92.3%), cardiac lesions were present in 10 cases (76.9%) and pulmonary edema and pulmonary congestion were present in all cases. The primary cause of death in 13 of the 31 cases was seizure disorder or epilepsy. The primary mechanism of death in SUDEP group was mainly asphyxia while that in the not-SUDEP group was cardiopulmonary failure (p < 0.05). Patients in the prone position had a significantly higher risk of asphyxia than those who were not. Here, we investigated the key characteristics between SUDEP and not-SUDEP death cases, which may help to facilitate forensic diagnosis in presumed SUDEP cases.

Keywords: autopsy; cause of death; forensic pathology; post-mortem findings; sudden unexpected death in epilepsy (SUDEP).