Objectives We evaluated liposomal amphotericin B versus voriconazole for the treatment of invasive pulmonary aspergillosis (IPA) in patients with hematological malignancy or hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Methods This retrospective cohort, single-center study included patients with compatible radiological diagnosis of IPA between 2016 and 2021. Results Forty-six patients with hematological malignancy or HSCT were diagnosed with IPA. Thirty-nine of them fulfilled the criteria for comparing liposomal amphotericin B (n=15) with voriconazole (n=24). Their median age was 48.5 years. Stem cell transplant recipients were 45.65%, and nearly half of the patients (47.83%) had acute myeloid leukemia. Twenty-six (56.52%) of the patients did not require oxygen therapy. The 12-week mortality was 13.33% (two out of 15) in patients who received liposomal amphotericin B compared to 25% (six out of 24) in patients who received voriconazole. There was no mortality judged to be related to IPA. Success or global clinical response was not different between the two drugs: 80% for liposomal amphotericin B versus 83.33% for voriconazole. However, the safety profile favored liposomal amphotericin B. Conclusion In this small cohort, there was an equipoise in the mortality and clinical and radiological outcomes obtained using liposomal amphotericin B or voriconazole for the treatment of IPA in hematological malignancy or HSCT.
Keywords: hematological malignancy; invasive pulmonary aspergillosis; liposomal amphotericin b; outcome; voriconazole.
Copyright © 2022, Mahmoud et al.