Prevalence of Spirometry Testing among Patients with Asthma and COPD in German General Practices

Healthcare (Basel). 2022 Dec 18;10(12):2570. doi: 10.3390/healthcare10122570.

Abstract

The goal of this study was to estimate the prevalence of spirometry testing among patients with asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) in general practices (GPs) in Germany. This retrospective cross-sectional study was based on data from the Disease Analyzer database (IQVIA), This retrospective cross-sectional study included all patients with at least one confirmed asthma or COPD diagnosis in one of those 50 general practices in Germany between January 2020, and January 2021, as well as at least one visit to these general practices between January 2021, and January 2022. The main outcomes of the study aimed to ascertain the proportion of spirometry testing among asthma and COPD patients between January 2021, and January 2022, overall, and separately, in men, women, six age groups (≤30, 31−40, 41−50, 51−60, 61, 70, >70), and patients who received at least one prescription of anti-asthma or anti-COPD drugs. This study included 8835 patients with asthma only, 5597 with COPD only, and 1897 with both asthma and COPD diagnoses. Of these, 27.2% of COPD patients, 7% of asthma patients, and 54.7% of asthma + COPD patients, received spirometry testing during the study period. Among COPD and asthma + COPD patients, the prevalence of spirometry testing was much higher in women than in men (COPD: 31.6% vs. 23.2%; asthma + COPD: 59.6% vs. 46.3%) and much higher in treated than in non-treated patients (COPD: 31.7% vs. 15.0%; asthma + COPD: 57.5% vs. 27.8%). The prevalence of spirometry testing was relatively low among COPD and asthma patients followed in GP practices, but usually higher in female patients, treated patients, and patients suffering from both asthma and COPD.

Keywords: COPD; asthma; general practice; lung function test; spirometry.

Grants and funding

This research received no external funding. Open Access funding provided by the Open Acess Publication Fund of Philipps-Universität Marburg with support of the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation).