Robotic versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy in elderly patients: a propensity score-matched analysis

HPB (Oxford). 2023 Mar;25(3):301-310. doi: 10.1016/j.hpb.2022.11.011. Epub 2022 Dec 5.

Abstract

Background: Pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) is complex procedure with high morbidity in the elderly. This retrospective study aimed to compare post-operative outcomes in patients ≥75 years of age who underwent robot-assisted (RA)PD and open PD.

Methods: We analyzed 2502 patients ≥75 years of age who underwent PD from 2015 to 2018 in the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database. RAPD and open PD patients were propensity score matched 1:5 to assess the 30-day outcomes of interest: postoperative complications, length of stay, discharge destination, and readmissions.

Results: Of 725 matched patients, 110 underwent RAPD, 615 OPD, and 12 were converted to an open operation. Post-operative outcomes were largely similar between cohorts. RAPD was associated a shorter length of stay (median 8 days, interquartile range [IQR] 6 to 11) than OPD (median 8 days, IQR 7 to 13) (p = 0.003). However, RAPD was associated with more readmissions (28.1% vs. 17.7%; p = 0.02).

Conclusions: RAPD in patients ≥75 years of age appears to be safe and has a similar complication profile to open PD. Randomized or well-designed prospective matched studies are needed to confirm these findings.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Aged
  • Humans
  • Laparoscopy* / adverse effects
  • Length of Stay
  • Pancreatic Neoplasms* / surgery
  • Pancreaticoduodenectomy / adverse effects
  • Postoperative Complications / etiology
  • Propensity Score
  • Prospective Studies
  • Random Amplified Polymorphic DNA Technique
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Robotic Surgical Procedures* / adverse effects
  • Robotics*