Autumnal migration patterns of hoverflies (Diptera: Syrphidae): interannual variability in timing and sex ratio

PeerJ. 2022 Dec 9:10:e14393. doi: 10.7717/peerj.14393. eCollection 2022.

Abstract

Background: The migration of hoverflies (Diptera: Syrphidae) is a well-known phenomenon, with growing interest due to the ecosystem services provided by migrants. However, we still lack fundamental data on species composition, timing of migration, or sex ratio of migrants. To address this gap, we focused on the southward autumnal migration of hoverflies through central Europe.

Methods: To recognize migrating individuals from resident ones, we used a pair of one-side-blocked Malaise traps, exposed in a mountain pass in the Jeseníky mountains, Czech Republic, where a mass migration of hoverflies takes place annually. Traps were set for 4 years, from August to October.

Results: In total, we recorded 31 species of migrating hoverflies. The timing of migration differed between the years, taking place from the beginning of September to the end of October. Differences in phenology were observed in the four most common migrant species, where larger species seemed to migrate earlier or at the same time compared to the smaller ones. The sex ratio was strongly asymmetrical in most common species Episyrphus balteatus, Eupeodes corollae, and Sphaerophoria scripta, and varied between years for each species. Weather conditions strongly influenced the migration intensity at ground-level: hoverflies migrate mainly during days with south wind, high temperature, high atmospheric pressure, and low precipitation.

Keywords: Biogeography; Flower flies; Insect; Migration; Phenology; Sex ratio.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Animals
  • Czech Republic
  • Diptera*
  • Ecosystem
  • Europe
  • Humans
  • Sex Ratio

Grants and funding

This project was supported by the Grant Agency of Charles University, projects no. 1030119/2019, the Charles University Research Centre program No. 204069, and the Support grant of the Charles University, SVV 260571/2020. The work of Antonin Hlaváček was supported by “Nadace Nadání Josefa, Marie a Zdeňky Hlávkových”. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.