The differences between conventional lead, thin lead, and leadless pacemakers regarding effects on tricuspid regurgitation in the early phase

Abstract

Purpose: Trans-venous pacemaker leads are associated with worsening of tricuspid regurgitation (TR) after pacemaker implantation (PMI) in some cases. Recently, leadless pacemakers and thin ventricular pacemaker leads without a stylet lumen have become popular. However, the differences in the effects of these leads on TR are unclear. We investigated differences in the changes in TR in the early phase after PMI in patients with conventional leads, thin leads, and leadless pacemakers.

Methods: We enrolled 65 patients who underwent PMI (32 males, 79 ± 8 years), including 48 with trans-venous PMI (29 with conventional 6.0-Fr leads and 19 with 4.1-Fr thin leads) and 17 with leadless pacemakers. Transthoracic echocardiography was performed before and 1 month after PMI for assessment of conventional echocardiographic parameters and severity of TR by quantitative assessment.

Results: Atrial fibrillation was the most frequent indication for PMI in patients with leadless pacemakers (p = 0.015). In the before and 1 month after PMI comparison, left ventricular ejection fraction decreased after PMI only in the conventional lead group (p = 0.022). The TR effective regurgitant orifice area (EROA) decreased post PMI in the leadless (p = 0.002) and thin lead groups (p = 0.001), but not in the conventional lead group (p = 0.596). The change in TR EROA was greater in the leadless and thin lead groups as compared with the conventional lead group (p < 0.05).

Conclusion: The decrease in TR EROA in the early phase after PMI differed according to the type of pacemaker lead. The thin lead might be beneficial for reduction of TR after PMI.

Keywords: Cardiac pacing; Echocardiography; Right ventricular function; Tricuspid regurgitation.