Performance of Sonoelastography for predicting malignancy in soft tissue

BMC Cancer. 2022 Dec 13;22(1):1305. doi: 10.1186/s12885-022-10300-4.

Abstract

Background: Separating benign from malignant soft-tissue masses often requires a biopsy. The objective of this study was to assess whether shear-wave elastography (SWE) helped to separate benign from malignant soft-tissue masses.

Methods: In 2015-2016, we prospectively included patients with soft-tissue masses deemed by our multidisciplinary sarcoma board to require a diagnostic biopsy. All patients underwent ultrasonography (US) followed by SWE to measure elasticity. We compared benign and malignant tumors, overall and after separating tumors with vs. without a fatty component. The biopsy findings, and surgical-specimen histology when available, served as the reference standard.

Results: We included 136 patients, 99 with non-fatty and 37 with fatty soft-tissue masses. Mean elasticity and tumor-to-fat elasticity ratio (T/F) values were significantly lower for the benign than the malignant soft-tissue masses in the overall cohort (30.9 vs. 50.0 kilopascals (kPa), P = 0.03; and 2.55 vs. 4.30, P = 0.046) and in the non-fatty subgroup (37.8 ± 31.9 vs. 58.9 ± 39.1 kPa, P = 0.049 and 2.89 ± 5.25 vs. 5.07 ± 5.41, P = 0.046). Data for fatty tumors were non relevant due to lack of conclusive results. By receiver operating characteristics curve analysis, a T/F cutoff of 3.5 had 46% sensitivity and 84% specificity for separating benign and malignant soft-tissue masses.

Conclusions: SWE had good specificity and poor sensitivity for separating benign from malignant soft-tissue masses.

Keywords: Elastography; Fatty masses; Soft-tissue masses; Ultrasonography.

MeSH terms

  • Breast Neoplasms*
  • Diagnosis, Differential
  • Elasticity Imaging Techniques* / methods
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Sensitivity and Specificity
  • Soft Tissue Neoplasms* / diagnostic imaging
  • Ultrasonography
  • Ultrasonography, Mammary / methods