Comparison of detection methods and genome quality when quantifying nuclear mitochondrial insertions in vertebrate genomes

Abstract

The integration of mitochondrial genome fragments into the nuclear genome is well documented, and the transfer of these mitochondrial nuclear pseudogenes (numts) is thought to be an ongoing evolutionary process. With the increasing number of eukaryotic genomes available, genome-wide distributions of numts are often surveyed. However, inconsistencies in genome quality can reduce the accuracy of numt estimates, and methods used for identification can be complicated by the diverse sizes and ages of numts. Numts have been previously characterized in rodent genomes and it was postulated that they might be more prevalent in a group of voles with rapidly evolving karyotypes. Here, we examine 37 rodent genomes, and an additional 26 vertebrate genomes, while also considering numt detection methods. We identify numts using DNA:DNA and protein:translated-DNA similarity searches and compare numt distributions among rodent and vertebrate taxa to assess whether some groups are more susceptible to transfer. A combination of protein sequence comparisons (protein:translated-DNA) and BLASTN genomic DNA searches detect 50% more numts than genomic DNA:DNA searches alone. In addition, higher-quality RefSeq genomes produce lower estimates of numts than GenBank genomes, suggesting that lower quality genome assemblies can overestimate numts abundance. Phylogenetic analysis shows that mitochondrial transfers are not associated with karyotypic diversity among rodents. Surprisingly, we did not find a strong correlation between numt counts and genome size. Estimates using DNA: DNA analyses can underestimate the amount of mitochondrial DNA that is transferred to the nucleus.

Keywords: BLASTN; Microtus; NUMT; TFASTX; karyotypic diversity; rodents; scoring matrix.