Despite the general acceptance of formic acid as the additive of choice for peptide reversed-phase LC-MS/MS applications, some still argue that the selection of acetic acid represents a better option. To settle this debate, we investigated both the difference in MS sensitivity and chromatographic behavior of peptides between these two systems. This interlaboratory study was performed using different MS setups and C18 separation media employing both 0.1% formic and 0.5% acetic acid as ion pairing modifiers. Relative to formic acid, we find an overall ∼2.2-2.5× increase in MS signal and a slight decrease in RP LC retention (-0.7% acetonitrile on average) for acetic acid conditions. While these two features have opposing effects on peptide detectability, we find that acetic acid produces up to 60% higher peptide ID output depending on the type of sample. The drop in RPLC retention increases with peptide net charge at acidic pH. MS signal is dependent on the difference between the charge of the precursor ion and the charge of the peptide in solution, favoring species with a low pI. Lower peptide retention under acetic acid conditions demonstrates its higher hydrophilicity and, as expected, leads to composition and sequence-dependent character of the observed retention shift.
Keywords: acetic acid; detection sensitivity; formic acid; peptide reversed-phase HPLC; separation selectivity.