Objective: Massive bone loss is a serious problem in the elderly. Joint replacement with modular prostheses represents the most common reconstructive technique after oncological and non-oncological resections. Megaprostheses are broadly available, adaptable and versatile and allow early mobilization and rehabilitation. Although segmental endoprosthetic implants are now widely used and despite innovations, complications remain far high. Our purpose is to establish what happens to megaprostheses of a specific anatomical site in the long term in a population with oncologic and non-oncologic indications treated at a single center solely by a few skilled surgeons.
Materials and methods: We retrospectively reviewed our institutional database. We collected 35 patients who underwent endoprosthetic reconstruction exclusively of the proximal femur for neoplastic and non-neoplastic disease between 2008 and 2021. The minimum follow-up was 12 months. Complications were collected and classified, and also adapted to the non-oncological setting.
Results: Taking into consideration the entire population, 94% of this survived the follow-up at 6 months, subsequently 85% at 1 year and 82% at 2 years. At follow-ups after 5 years, 79% of megaprostheses showed no mechanical failure. Analyzing prosthetic survival in the two groups, this was >50% at 24 months after surgery in both groups, with better survival for the oncological one.
Conclusions: Proximal femur replacement can be a valid option in treatment of oncological and non-oncological cases. Due to the high complication rate, only selected cases should undergo this kind of surgical procedure.