Fracture liaison service model: project design and accreditation

Osteoporos Int. 2023 Feb;34(2):339-348. doi: 10.1007/s00198-022-06600-x. Epub 2022 Nov 24.

Abstract

Frailty fractures place a significant socioeconomic burden on the health care system. The Italian Society of Orthopaedics and Traumatology (SIOT) is proceeding to fracture liaison service (FLS) model accreditation in several Italian Fracture Units (FUs), which provides a multidisciplinary approach for the management of the fragility fracture patient.

Introduction: Osteoporosis and the resulting fragility fractures, particularly femoral fractures, place significant socioeconomic burdens on the health care system globally. In addition, there is a general lack of awareness of osteoporosis, resulting in underestimation of the associated risks and suboptimal treatment of the disease. The fracture liaison service (FLS) represents an exemplary model of post-fracture care that involves a multidisciplinary approach to the frail patient through the collaboration of multiple specialists. The purpose of this article is to highlight the path undertaken by the Italian Society of Orthopaedics and Traumatology (SIOT) for the purpose of certification of numerous FLS centers throughout Italy.

Methods: SIOT is proceeding with international FLS accreditation in several Italian Fracture Units (FUs), following the creation of a model that provides specific operational and procedural steps for the management of fragility fractures throughout the country. FUs that decide to join the project and implement this model within their facility are then audited by an ACCREDIA-accredited medical certification body.

Results: The drafted FLS model, thanks to the active involvement of a panel of experts appointed by SIOT, outlines a reference operational model that describes a fluid and articulated process that identifies the procedure of identification, description of diagnostic framing, and subsequent initiation of appropriate secondary prevention programs for fractures of individuals who have presented with a recent fragility fracture of the femur.

Conclusion: Accreditation of this prevention model will enable many facilities to take advantage of this dedicated diagnostic-therapeutic pathway for the purpose of fracture prevention and reduction of associated health and social costs.

Keywords: Fracture liaison service; Fragility fracture; Osteoporosis; Socio-economic burden; Treatment gap.

MeSH terms

  • Accreditation
  • Bone Density Conservation Agents* / therapeutic use
  • Delivery of Health Care
  • Humans
  • Osteoporosis* / complications
  • Osteoporosis* / diagnosis
  • Osteoporosis* / therapy
  • Osteoporotic Fractures* / diagnosis
  • Osteoporotic Fractures* / etiology
  • Osteoporotic Fractures* / prevention & control
  • Secondary Prevention

Substances

  • Bone Density Conservation Agents