[Cancer imaging and prevention of renal failure]

Bull Cancer. 2022 Nov 9:S0007-4551(22)00392-7. doi: 10.1016/j.bulcan.2022.09.011. Online ahead of print.
[Article in French]

Abstract

The risk of acute renal failure (ARF) following iodinated contrast media injection has long been overestimated because of the previous use of more toxic ICPs and uncontrolled studies. Nowadays, this concept is being questioned. Patients with severe renal failure and/or ARF are the only group still considered at risk. In these patients, it is necessary to discuss an alternative without an iodinated contrast agent. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound, MRI, spectral CT or PET-CT scan can be used instead of contrast-enhanced CT. Preventive measures should be applied when appropriate substitute to CT is not available or not diagnosed (minimum necessary dose of ICP, interruption of some treatments and prior hydration). These recommendations formalized by the European Society of Urogenital Radiology (ESUR) in 2018 address most situations faced by clinicians. In complex situations, an opinion from a nephrologist remains necessary after asking the radiologist about the availability of acceptable substitutes.

Keywords: Cancer; IRA post-PCI; Iodinated contrast media; Nephropathy; Néphropathie; Post-PCI AKI; Produits de contraste iodés.

Publication types

  • English Abstract
  • Review