Safety and efficacy of adjunct tirofiban treatment following mechanical thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke patients with large vessel occlusion (LVO) resulting in successful reperfusion

Hai-Long Zhong; Teng-Fei Zhou; Ying-Kun He; Tian-Xiao Li; Zhao-Shuo Li

doi:10.1177/15910199221138883

Safety and efficacy of adjunct tirofiban treatment following mechanical thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke patients with large vessel occlusion (LVO) resulting in successful reperfusion

Interv Neuroradiol. 2022 Nov 10:15910199221138883. doi: 10.1177/15910199221138883. Online ahead of print.

Authors

Hai-Long Zhong¹, Teng-Fei Zhou¹, Ying-Kun He¹, Tian-Xiao Li¹, Zhao-Shuo Li¹

Affiliation

¹ Department of Cerebrovascular Disease, Zhengzhou University People's Hospital, 89632Henan Provincial People's Hospital, Zhengzhou, Henan, China.

PMID: 36358016
DOI: 10.1177/15910199221138883

Abstract

Background and purpose: Tirofiban administration after mechanical thrombectomy (MT) remains controversial. This study aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of adjunct tirofiban treatment following MT for acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients with large vessel occlusion (LVO) that resulted in successful reperfusion on digital subtraction angiography (DSA).

Methods: This retrospective study was conducted in Zhengzhou University University People's Hospital, an advanced stroke center in China. Consecutive patients with AIS who underwent endovascular therapy (EVT) were enrolled from June 2018 to January 2022. The safety endpoints were symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (sICH), total intracranial hemorrhage (ICH), and 3-month mortality. The efficacy endpoints were 3-month modified Rankin scale (mRS) score and 24-h neurological improvement.

Results: A total of 145 consecutive patients with AIS who underwent MT were analyzed, of whom 51 (35.2%) patients were in the tirofiban group. There were 30 (20.7%) patients with sICH, 50 (34.5%) patients suffered from ICH within 24-h post-MT, and 47 (32.4%) dead at 3-month. Besides, 31 (21.4%) patients achieved excellent clinical outcomes (mRS, 0-1), and 24-h neurological improvement was found in 29 (20.0%) patients. No statistically significant differences were found in safety outcomes on sICH, total ICH, and 3-month mortality, as well as efficacy outcomes on 3-month mRS scores (0-1) and 24-h neurological improvement between the two groups (P > 0.05 for all). Additionally, tirofiban was associated with 3-month mRS scores of 0-2 (adjusted odds ratio (OR), 3.75; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.41-10.02, P = 0.008).

Conclusion: Adjunct tirofiban treatment following MT for AIS patients with LVO that resulted in successful reperfusion on DSA was not correlated with the increased risk of safety endpoints on sICH, ICH, and 3-month mortality, and it may be associated with a lower 3-month mRS score.

Keywords: Tirofiban; acute ischemic stroke; mechanical thrombectomy; vessel recanalization.