Restoration of thoracic kyphosis in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis with patient-specific rods: did the preoperative plan match postoperative sagittal alignment?

Abstract

Purpose: To determine if the planned sagittal profile for thoracic kyphosis (TK) restoration was achieved after adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) surgery using a novel hybrid construct with apical double bands and precontoured patient-specific rods (PSR) made according to the detailed surgical plan for the desired sagittal plane.

Methods: AIS patients with a Lenke type 1-4 primary right thoracic curve who underwent corrective surgery by a single surgeon and had minimum 24-month follow-up were analyzed retrospectively from a prospective database. All patients underwent simultaneous translation on two rods with apical double bands and PSR. Clinical outcomes in terms of sagittal 2D TK (T4-T12), lumbar lordosis (LL), sagittal vertical axis (SVA), pelvic incidence (PI), pelvic tilt (PT), sacral slope (SS), PI-LL mismatch, rod angle, and rod deflection were compared between preoperative, planned, and 24-month data, while 3D apical rotation, 3D TK (T5-T12), sagittal thoracolumbar angle, degree of curvature at L1-L4 and L4-S1, proximal junctional angle, and distal junctional angle were compared at baseline and at 6 and 24 months postoperatively. SRS-22 questionnaire scores were obtained at baseline and 24 months postoperatively.

Results: Forty-eight patients were included. Study patients had a median coronal thoracic curve of 62.7° preoperatively and 22.4° at 24-month follow-up (p < 0.001). Median TK gain was 6.5° for the entire cohort (n = 48) and 19.1° in the Lenke type 1 and 2 hypokyphotic subgroup (n = 14). Both groups had no significant changes between planned and 24-month TK (p = 0.068 and p = 0.943, respectively), rod angle (p = 0.776 and p = 0.548, respectively), or rod deflection (p = 0.661 and p = 0.850, respectively). For the overall study cohort, median LL gain was 7.0° (p < 0.001), 3D apical derotation was 10.7° (p < 0.001), and change in 3D TK was 36° (p < 0.001). No instance of proximal junctional kyphosis was observed. SRS-22 scores for pain, self-image, and satisfaction differed significantly between the preoperative and 24-month follow-up time-points.

Conclusions: With sagittal plane planning, desired TK, improved reciprocal changes in LL, and minimal changes in rod shape can be achieved in patients with AIS.

Keywords: Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis; Patient-specific rods; Rod shape; Sagittal alignment; Thoracic kyphosis.