Liver regeneration after two-stage liver transplantation is more effective than after other preconditioning procedures in colorectal liver metastases

Abstract

Introduction: Induction of liver regeneration represents an option to expand the resectability in patients with expected small future liver remnant (FLR). The aim of this cohort-study is to compare the liver regeneration between different surgical procedures, including novel procedures such as two-stage living donor liver transplantation using small-for-size grafts.

Methods: Forty-three patients with colorectal liver metastases were included between 2004 and 2020. They underwent one of the following three procedures: portal vein embolization (PVE), associated liver partition with portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy (ALPPS), and living donor two-stage liver transplantation (LT). The volume gain of the future liver remnant was analyzed in comparison between the three mentioned procedures.

Results: The type of surgery performed had a significant correlation with liver regeneration with a strong effect on the benefit of ALPPS and liver transplantation, respectively (r = .6, p = .00003). The type of surgery was the only independent co-factor in the multiple regression, which showed a significant influence on FLR-increase favoring two-stage transplantation compared to the other two related procedures (ß = .12, T = 3.9, p = .0004). The histological and immunohistochemical studies also showed a clear advantage of proliferation to the benefits of two-stage liver transplantation compared with ALPPS.

Conclusion: Two-stage liver transplantation using small-for-size grafts induces better FLR-increase than portal vein embolization or ALPPS in patients with colorectal liver metastases.

Keywords: Colorectal liver metastases; Liver regeneration; Liver transplantation.