Real-World Accuracy of a SARS-CoV-2 Rapid Diagnostic Tests in the Republic of Korea

J Korean Med Sci. 2022 Nov 7;37(43):e310. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2022.37.e310.

Abstract

Antigen rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) became the most important tool for the diagnosis of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), however there have been very few evaluations of the accuracy of the RDTs in actual use. In this study, we investigated the performance accuracy of the RDT, the STANDARD Q COVID-19 Ag (STANDARD Q), in the Republic of Korea. We collected a total of 5,792 results that underwent both RDT and reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction simultaneously, and overall sensitivity and specificity of the STANDARD Q were 57.6% and 99.9%, respectively. With binomial logistic regression analysis, we estimated that about half of the COVID-19 patients with a cycle threshold value of 25 for E and RdRP were RDT-negative. These results suggest that the clinical sensitivity of RDTs against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 is considerably low in a real-world setting, and we recommend that limitations of RDTs should be considered when setting up COVID-19 test strategies.

Keywords: COVID-19; Rapid Diagnostic Test; SARS-CoV-2.

MeSH terms

  • Antigens, Viral
  • COVID-19* / diagnosis
  • Diagnostic Tests, Routine
  • Humans
  • Republic of Korea
  • SARS-CoV-2*
  • Sensitivity and Specificity

Substances

  • Antigens, Viral