Racial and ethnic disparities in major adverse limb events persist for chronic limb threatening ischemia despite presenting limb threat severity after peripheral vascular intervention

Abstract

Objective: Racial and ethnic disparities have been well-documented in the outcomes for chronic limb threatening ischemia (CLTI). One purported explanation has been the disease severity at presentation. We hypothesized that the disparities in major adverse limb events (MALE) after peripheral vascular intervention (PVI) for CLTI would persist despite controlling for disease severity at presentation using the WIfI (Wound, Ischemia, foot Infection) stage.

Methods: The Vascular Quality Initiative PVI dataset (2016-2021) was queried for CLTI. Patients were excluded if they were missing the WIfI stage. The primary end point was the incidence of 1-year MALE, defined as major amputation (through the tibia or fibula or more proximally) or reintervention (endovascular or surgical) of the initial treatment limb. A multivariate hierarchical Fine-Gray analysis was performed, controlling for hospital variation, competing risk of death, and presenting WIfI stage, to assess the independent association of Black/African American race and Latinx/Hispanic ethnicity with MALE. A Cox proportional hazard regression model was used for the 1-year survival analysis.

Results: Overall, 47,830 patients (60%) had had WIfI scores reported (73% White, 20% Black, and 7% Latinx). The 1-year unadjusted cumulative incidence of MALE was 13.1% (95% confidence interval [CI], 12.6%-13.5%) for White, 14.3% (95% CI, 13.5%-15.3%) for Black, and 17.0% (95% CI, 15.3%-18.9%) for Latinx patients. On bivariate analysis, the occurrence of MALE was significantly associated with younger age, Black race, Latinx ethnicity, coronary artery disease, cerebrovascular disease, congestive heart failure, hypertension, diabetes, dialysis, intervention level, any prior minor or major amputation, and WIfI stage (P < .001). The cumulative incidence of 1-year MALE increased by increasing WIfI stage: stage 1, 11.7% (95% CI, 10.9%-12.4%); stage 2, 12.4% (95% CI, 11.8%-13.0%); stage 3, 14.8% (95% CI, 13.8%-15.8%); and stage 4, 15.4% (95% CI, 14.3%-16.6%). The cumulative incidence also increased by intervention level: inflow, 10.7% (95% CI, 9.8%-11.7%), femoropopliteal, 12.3% (95% CI, 11.7%-12.9%); and infrapopliteal, 14.1% (95% CI, 13.5%-14.8%). After adjustment for WIfI stage only, Black race (subdistribution hazard ratio [SHR], 1.30; 95% CI, 1.17-1.44; P < .001) and Latinx ethnicity (SHR, 1.58; 95% CI, 1.37-1.81; P < .001) were associated with an increased 1-year hazard of MALE compared with White race. On adjusted multivariable analysis, MALE disparities persisted for Black/African American race (SHR, 1.12; 95% CI, 1.01-1.25; P = .028) and Latinx/Hispanic ethnicity (SHR, 1.34; 95% CI, 1.16-1.54; P < .001) compared with White race.

Conclusions: Black/African American and Latinx/Hispanic patients had a higher associated hazard of MALE after PVI for CLTI compared with White patients despite an adjustment for WIfI stage at presentation. These results suggest that disease severity at presentation does not account for disparities in outcomes. Further work should focus on better understanding the underlying mechanisms for disparities in historically marginalized racial and ethnic groups presenting with CLTI.

Keywords: Amputations; Ethnic minority; Healthcare disparity; Peripheral artery disease; Racial factors.