Predicting histopathology markers of endometrial carcinoma with a quantitative image analysis approach based on spherical harmonics in multiparametric MRI

Abstract

Purpose: Identifying optimal machine learning pipelines for computer-aided diagnosis is key for the development of robust, reproducible, and clinically relevant imaging biomarkers for endometrial carcinoma. The purpose of this study was to introduce the mathematical development of image descriptors computed from spherical harmonics (SPHARM) decompositions as well as the associated machine learning pipeline, and to evaluate their performance in predicting deep myometrial invasion (MI) and histopathological high-grade in preoperative multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

Patients and methods: This retrospective study included 128 women with histopathology-confirmed endometrial carcinomas who underwent 1.5-T MRI before hysterectomy between January 2011 and July 2015. SPHARM descriptors of each tumor were computed on multiparametric MRI images (T2-weighted, diffusion-weighted, dynamic contrast-enhanced-MRI and apparent diffusion coefficient maps). Tensor-based logistic regression was used to classify two-dimensional SPHARM rotationally-invariant descriptors. Head-to-head comparisons with radiomics analyses were performed with DeLong tests with Bonferroni-Holm correction to compare diagnostic performances.

Results: With all MRI contrasts, SPHARM analysis resulted in area under the curve, sensitivity, specificity, and balanced accuracy values of 0.94 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.85, 1.00), 100% (95% CI: 100, 100), 74% (95% CI: 51, 92), 87% (95% CI: 78, 98), respectively, for predicting deep MI. For predicting high-grade tumor histology, the corresponding values for the same diagnostic metrics were 0.81 (95% CI: 0.64, 0.90), 93% (95% CI: 67, 100), 63% (95% CI: 45, 79) and 78% (95% CI: 64, 86). The corresponding values achieved via radiomics were 0.92 (95% CI: 0.82, 0.95), 82% (95% CI: 65, 93), 80% (95% CI: 51, 94), 81% (95% CI: 70, 91) for deep MI and 0.72 (95% CI: 0.58, 0.83), 93% (95% CI: 65, 100), 55% (95% CI: 41, 69), 74% (95% CI: 52, 88) for high-grade histology. The diagnostic performance of the SPHARM analysis was not significantly different (P = 0.62) from that of radiomics for predicting deep MI but was significantly higher (P = 0.044) for predicting high-grade histology.

Conclusion: The proposed SPHARM analysis yields similar or higher diagnostic performance than radiomics in identifying deep MI and high-grade status in histology-proven endometrial carcinoma.

Keywords: Artificial intelligence; Endometrial cancer; Machine learning; Magnetic resonance imaging; Spherical harmonics (SPHARM); Three-dimensional imaging.