Evaluation of the Role of Oral Mucosal Direct Immunofluorescence and Salivary Desmoglein 1 and 3 Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay in Patients With Oral Mucosal Pemphigus

Indian Dermatol Online J. 2022 Sep 5;13(5):617-619. doi: 10.4103/idoj.idoj_44_22. eCollection 2022 Sep-Oct.

Abstract

Background: Pemphigus vulgaris (PV) is characterized by antibodies against desmosomal adhesion proteins desmoglein (Dsg) 1 and 3 which can be detected by direct immunofluorescence (DIF) or enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Oral lesions usually precede cutaneous lesions and an early diagnosis can prevent mortality and morbidity. Dsg antibodies can be detected by ELISA in saliva of patients with oral mucosal pemphigus. This study compares oral mucosal DIF with the salivary Dsg1 and 3 ELISA.

Materials and methods: A total of 26 biopsy and/or DIF-proven PV patients with oral erosions without cutaneous lesions were included in the study. Biopsy of oral mucosa was taken for DIF by standard method. Saliva sample was obtained and processed for ELISA. The results were then compared.

Results: Out of 26 patients, 22 (84.6%) had a positive oral mucosal DIF and four patients (15.4%) had negative DIF. Nine patients (34%) had positive salivary Dsg3 ELISA. Seven patients (27%) had positive salivary Dsg1 ELISA. Taking oral DIF as the gold standard, the sensitivity of salivary Dsg1 ELISA was 31.8% and of salivary Dsg3 ELISA was 40.9%.

Conclusion: Although DIF is the gold standard for the diagnosis of PV, salivary Dsg1 and 3 ELISA can also be used in the diagnosis of oral pemphigus.

Keywords: Oral DIF; oral mucosal pemphigus; salivary desmoglein ELISA.