The incidence of opportunistic infections in patients with psoriatic arthritis treated with biologic and targeted synthetic agents: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Athanasios Vassilopoulos; Fadi Shehadeh; Gregorio Benitez; Markos Kalligeros; Joanne S Cunha; Cheston B Cunha; Eleftherios Mylonakis

doi:10.3389/fphar.2022.992713

The incidence of opportunistic infections in patients with psoriatic arthritis treated with biologic and targeted synthetic agents: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Front Pharmacol. 2022 Oct 5:13:992713. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2022.992713. eCollection 2022.

Authors

Athanasios Vassilopoulos^{1

2}, Fadi Shehadeh^{1

2

3}, Gregorio Benitez^{1

2}, Markos Kalligeros^{1

2}, Joanne S Cunha², Cheston B Cunha^{1

2}, Eleftherios Mylonakis^{1

2}

Affiliations

¹ Infectious Diseases Division, Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, RI, United States.
² Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI, United States.
³ School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, National Technical University of Athens, Athens, Greece.

Abstract

Background: Biologic (bDMARD) and targeted synthetic (tsDMARD) disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs have broadened the treatment options and are increasingly used for patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA). These agents block different pro-inflammatory cytokines or specific intracellular signaling pathways that promote inflammation and can place patients at risk of serious infections. We aimed to review the incidence of opportunistic infections (OIs) in patients with PsA who were treated with these agents. Methods: We searched PubMed and EMBASE through 14 April 2022 for randomized clinical trials evaluating bDMARD or tsDMARD in the treatment of PsA. Trials were eligible if they compared the effect of a bDMARD or tsDMARD with placebo and provided safety data. We used the Revised Cochrane risk-of-bias tool to assess the risk of bias among trials, and stratified the studies by mechanism of action (MOA) of the agents studied. Results: We included 47 studies in this analysis. A total of 17,197 patients received at least one dose of an agent of interest. The cumulative incidence of OIs by MOA was as follows: 1) JAK inhibitors: 2.72% (95% CI: 1.05%-5.04%), 2) anti-IL-17: 1.18% (95% CI: 0.60%-1.9%), 3) anti-IL-23: 0.24% (95% CI: 0.04%-0.54%), and 4) anti-TNFs: 0.01% (95% CI: 0.00%-0.21%). Based on their MOA, these agents are known to increase the risk of certain serious infections. The cumulative incidence of herpes zoster infection following treatment with JAK inhibitors (JAKi) was 2.53% (95% CI: 1.03%-4.57%) and the cumulative incidence of opportunistic Candida spp. infections following treatment with anti-IL-17, was 0.97% (95% CI: 0.51%-1.56%). Conclusion: The overall incidence of OIs among patients with PsA who were treated with biologic and targeted synthetic agents is low. However, careful monitoring is warranted for specific OIs such as herpes zoster infection following JAKi treatment, mucocutaneous candidiasis following anti-IL-17 treatment, and Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection following anti-TNF treatment.

Keywords: BDMARDs; Candida spp; JAK inhibitors; herpes zoster; opportunistic infections; psoriatic arthritis; tsDMARDs.

Publication types

Systematic Review