Purpose: The diagnosis and classification of ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL) can be difficult with radiography alone; therefore, computed tomography (CT) is also usually performed. There are many reports on the usefulness of digital tomosynthesis (DTS) for image analysis in orthopedics. This study aimed to compare the accuracy of DTS with radiography and CT for the diagnosis and classification of cervical OPLL (C-OPLL).
Materials and methods: We included 31 patients with OPLL and 30 with cervical spondylotic myelopathy. The patients' cervical spine radiography, DTS, and CT images were each evaluated twice by three specialists and three residents.
Results: In the intra-observer reliability study, there was one observer with a fair level of kappa values for radiography and DTS among three residents. The kappa values for CT were the best for all observers. In the inter-observer reliability study, the interclass correlation coefficient (ICC) values were high for both diagnosis and classification by specialists at the almost perfect level for all three imaging modalities. On the other hand, the ICC values for both diagnosis and classification for radiography by the residents were lower than those for DTS and CT.
Conclusions: This study revealed that DTS may be an alternative to CT for the diagnosis and classification of C-OPLL by specialists. Caution should be exercised in diagnosing and classifying C-OPLL using radiography and DTS by residents, and the use of CT is recommended.
Keywords: Cervical spine; Computed tomography (CT); Digital tomosynthesis (DTS); Ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL).
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.