Comparison of Different Volatile Extraction Methods for the Identification of Fishy Off-Odor in Fish By-Products

Molecules. 2022 Sep 21;27(19):6177. doi: 10.3390/molecules27196177.

Abstract

This study was conducted to analyze volatile odor compounds and key odor-active compounds in the fish soup using fish scarp and bone. Five extraction methods, including solid-phase microextraction (SPME), dynamic headspace sampling (DHS), solvent-assisted flavor evaporation (SAFE), stir bar sorptive extraction (SBSE), liquid-liquid extraction (LLE), were compared and SPME was finally selected as the best extraction method for further study. The volatile odor compounds were analyzed by gas chromatography-olfactometry-mass spectrometry (GC-O-MS) and comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography-olfactometry-mass spectrometry (GC × GC-O-MS) techniques, and the key odor-active compounds were identified via aroma extract dilution analysis (AEDA) and relative odor activity value (r-OAV) calculation. A total of 38 volatile compounds were identified by GC-O-MS, among which 10 were declared as odor-active compounds. Whereas 39 volatile compounds were identified by GC × GC-O-MS, among which 12 were declared as odor-active compounds. The study results revealed that 1-octen-3-one, 2-pentylfuran, (E)-2-octenal, 1-octen-3-one, hexanal, 1-octen-3-ol, 6-methylhept-5-en-2-one, (E,Z)-2,6-nondienal and 2-ethyl-3,5-dimethylpyrazine were the key odor-active compounds in the fish soup.

Keywords: AEDA; GC × GC-O-MS; GC-O-MS; fish scraps; fish soup; r-OAV.

MeSH terms

  • Animals
  • Ketones
  • Odorants* / analysis
  • Olfactometry / methods
  • Plant Extracts
  • Solvents
  • Volatile Organic Compounds* / analysis

Substances

  • Ketones
  • Plant Extracts
  • Solvents
  • Volatile Organic Compounds
  • 1-octen-3-one