Method Validation and Assessment of Hazardous Substances and Quality Control Characteristics in Traditional Fruit Wines

Foods. 2022 Sep 30;11(19):3047. doi: 10.3390/foods11193047.

Abstract

The presence of potentially hazardous substances in fruit wines poses a threat for human health. However, the management standards and specifications of hazardous substances contained within various types of fruit wines are currently insufficient. The aim of this study was to analyze hazardous substances (cyanide, acetaldehyde, and ethyl carbamate) and quality control characteristics (pH, titratable acidity, sulfur dioxide, and diacetyl) in seven different types of fruit wines. The pH levels and titratable acidity varied between fruit wine types. In all fruit wines, sulfur dioxide (SO2) was within acceptable ranges as per the Korean standard. Acetaldehyde content also varied between fruit wine types as well as based on the analytical method (titration or enzymatic analysis) employed. Cyanide was in the range of 0.02−0.35 mg/L. Diacetyl contents were in the range of 0.66−2.95 mg/L (p > 0.05). The contents of ethyl carbamate varied considerably, within the range of 5.22−259.69 μg/kg (p < 0.05). The analytical methods of diacetyl and ethyl carbamate were validated for specificity, linearity, sensitivity, accuracy, and precision. Therefore, the content of hazardous substances and quality control characteristics should be closely monitored and controlled to improve safety and quality of the traditional fruit wines.

Keywords: acetaldehyde; cyanide; diacetyl, ethyl carbamate; fruit wine; method validation; sulfur dioxide.