Assuming accuracy, pretending influence? Risks of measuring, monitoring and reporting sustainable development goals

Ambio. 2023 Apr;52(4):702-710. doi: 10.1007/s13280-022-01787-z. Epub 2022 Sep 30.

Abstract

From the local to global level, indicators and reports are produced and published to support the transition towards sustainable development. Building from two European-level science-policy workshops, this perspective essay discusses the types of risks involved with such sustainability reporting. The analysis is rooted in the framework of the UN 2030 Agenda and sustainable development goals (SDG). As a globally adopted framework, it provides an example of how risks are either recognised and framed, or non-recognised. Well recognised risks include data availability for SDGs and siloed preparation of indicators, while risks receiving less attention are ritualistic reporting lacking a critical evaluation of the limitations of the SDG framework itself. These different risks are likely to reinforce each other. A specific risk is a too narrow focus on one-way communication aiming to inform individual policy decisions. Risks related to SDGs are best managed with iterative, integrative and interactive knowledge production fostering holistic understanding.

Keywords: Agenda 2030; Indicators; Risk management; Risk perceptions; Sustainability.

MeSH terms

  • Global Health*
  • Sustainable Development*