A qualitative exploration of patient preferences for Medicare Part D consultation services offered in a community pharmacy setting

Abstract

Background: Community pharmacies currently offer Medicare Part D consultation services to help eligible beneficiaries select prescription medication insurance. Despite these service offerings, there is a paucity of information on patient preferences for these service offerings and optimal service delivery from the patient perspective.

Objectives: The objectives of this study were to (1) evaluate patient expectations of and willingness-to-pay (WTP) for community pharmacy Medicare Part D consultation services, (2) identify components of Medicare Part D consultation services associated with service quality, and (3) explore differences in preferences and service expectations between services-experienced and service-naive patients.

Methods: This was a qualitative exploratory study, with data collected using interviews and a follow-up supplemental survey with participants recruited from 5 community pharmacies across the state of Iowa participating in the Community Pharmacy Enhanced Services Network. A total of 17 patients contacted the research team for participation. Interviews were recorded and transcribed, with qualitative data analysis performed using template analysis guided by the SERVQUAL framework. Interview participants were invited to complete a supplemental survey. Descriptive statistics and frequencies were generated for survey items. Service-experienced and service-naive survey responses Pearson chi-square and Welch t tests were used to determine significant differences between service-experienced and service-naive responses for categorical and continuous variables, respectively.

Results: In total, all 17 patients who contacted the research team agreed to participate in interviews, with 8 service-experienced and 9 service-naive interviews completed. Template analysis identified 14 subdomains across the SERVQUAL domains. Similarities and differences in service preferences between groups were identified, focusing on patient-pharmacist trust, past service experience, and WTP. All interview participants completed supplemental surveys, with no statistically significant differences between service-experienced and service-naive participant characteristics identified.

Conclusions: Service-experienced patients emphasized components of the service that contribute to service quality and generally reported higher WTP values. Many service-naive patients were unaware community pharmacies provided consultation services, suggesting that pharmacists may benefit from considering how services are offered to patients based on the specific preferences and expectations and consider ways to increase awareness of service offerings.