Mini-Implant Rejection Rate in Teenage Patients Depending on Insertion Site: A Retrospective Study

Teodora Consuela Bungău; Luminița Ligia Vaida; Abel Emanuel Moca; Gabriela Ciavoi; Raluca Iurcov; Ioana Mihaela Romanul; Camelia Liana Buhaș

doi:10.3390/jcm11185331

Mini-Implant Rejection Rate in Teenage Patients Depending on Insertion Site: A Retrospective Study

J Clin Med. 2022 Sep 10;11(18):5331. doi: 10.3390/jcm11185331.

Authors

Teodora Consuela Bungău¹, Luminița Ligia Vaida¹, Abel Emanuel Moca¹, Gabriela Ciavoi¹, Raluca Iurcov¹, Ioana Mihaela Romanul¹, Camelia Liana Buhaș²

Affiliations

¹ Department of Dentistry, Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, University of Oradea, 10 Piața 1 Decembrie Street, 410073 Oradea, Romania.
² Department of Morphological Disciplines, Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, University of Oradea, 410087 Oradea, Romania.

Abstract

Mini-implants have undeniable advantages in Orthodontics. However, the use of mini-implants shows some limitations and disadvantages related to patient age, the quality of the bone tissue, the characteristics of the oral mucosa, implant site, the state of health of the organism and the quality of oral hygiene. The aim of this paper was to analyze the rejection rate of mini-implants in teenage patients, depending on their insertion site, and examine their stability up to three months after insertion. This retrospective study was conducted on dental charts belonging to patients aged between 12 and 17 years, from Oradea, Romania. The mini-implants were placed for various therapeutic reasons and were inserted in the following sites: buccal maxillary area, the infrazygomatic region, palatal area, buccal mandibular area and lingual area; they had a diameter of 1.6 mm (inter-radicular spaces) and of 2 mm (nonbearing tooth areas), and a length of 6-8 mm (mandible) or 8-10 mm (maxilla). The rejection rate was checked in the first month, second month, third month and after the third month from insertion. A total of 432 patients were included in the study, and they had a total of 573 mini-implants. Most implants were placed in the buccal region of the maxilla (27.7%), and most patients had one mini-implant placed (65.7%). The highest rejection rate was obtained in the first month (15.2%). The rejection rate between genders was similar. The mini-implants from the buccal mandibular region had a significantly higher rate of rejection in the first month (M1) in comparison to the mini-implants from the palatal region (24.4% vs. 8.3%). The mini-implants from the lingual region of the mandible had a significantly higher rate of rejection in the second month (M2) in comparison to the mini-implants from the infrazygomatic or the palatal region (10.5% vs. 0%/0%). Mini-implants are very useful for carrying out various orthodontic treatments, but their stability should be enhanced.

Keywords: insertion site; mini-implants; rejection rate; teenagers.

Grants and funding

This research received no external funding.