Third- and Late Line Treatments of Metastatic Gastric Cancer: Still More to Be Done

Curr Oncol. 2022 Sep 8;29(9):6433-6444. doi: 10.3390/curroncol29090506.

Abstract

In recent years, advances of anticancer and supportive therapies have determined a gradual improvement in survival rates and patients' general conditions in metastatic gastric cancer (mGC), allowing them to receive further treatments. The choice of treatment is driven by performance status, age, stage of disease, number of metastatic sites and time from the first to third line of treatment. Targets such as microsatellite instability, PD-L1 expression, and HER2 overexpression or amplification may be addressed to personalise treatment and prolong survival. Despite a growing number of third line options that have provided clinicians with greater opportunities to customise treatments, up to date few agents have been demonstrated as effective after two standard lines for mGC; for these reasons, chemotherapy, immunotherapy, and targeted therapy were all widely investigated in both phase II and phase III studies. Overall, TAS-102, apatinib, regorafenib, nilotinib, trastuzumab, and pembrolizumab were demonstrated to be valid options in the third line scenario for mGC patient refractory to at least two lines of therapy. A multimodal approach based on chemotherapy, immunotherapy, targeted agents, a personalised nutritional programme as well as the research of new predictive biomarkers may pave the way to new strategies to identify the best treatment for each patient.

Keywords: chemotherapy; metastatic gastric cancer; third line therapy.

Publication types

  • Review

MeSH terms

  • Antineoplastic Agents* / therapeutic use
  • B7-H1 Antigen
  • Humans
  • Stomach Neoplasms* / drug therapy
  • Trastuzumab / therapeutic use

Substances

  • Antineoplastic Agents
  • B7-H1 Antigen
  • Trastuzumab

Grants and funding

This research received no external funding.