Impact of inter-hospital transfer on success of angioembolization for lower gastrointestinal bleeding

ANZ J Surg. 2022 Dec;92(12):3242-3246. doi: 10.1111/ans.18054. Epub 2022 Sep 19.

Abstract

Background: Angioembolization is a useful therapeutic tool for lower gastrointestinal bleeding (LGIB) however is only available at centres with specialist interventional radiology departments. Delay in angioembolization of greater than 120-150 minutes is associated with higher rates of non-therapeutic angioembolization.

Methods: This retrospective review analysed the impact of interhospital transfer on timing and success of angioembolization in adults with LGIB.

Results: Of the 121 patients who underwent CTMA at a peripheral hospital for LGIB, only 20.7% had positive CTMA (n = 25). Of the 24 patients who were transferred for the purpose of angioembolization, only five ultimately had successful embolisation (20.1%). Patients who had unsuccessful angioembolization had a significantly longer mean time from arrival at the tertiary hospital to angioembolization compared to patients who had successful angioembolization (mean 375 versus 175 min, P = 0.001). There was no association of patient haemodynamics, use of anticoagulant or antiplatelet therapy, and transfusion requirement with success of angioembolization.

Conclusion: Interhospital transfer is associated with delay in angioembolization. Delay after arrival at the receiving hospital is associated with unsuccessful angioembolization.

Keywords: PR bleed; angioembolization; haematochezia; lower GI bleeding; rectal bleeding.

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Blood Transfusion
  • Embolization, Therapeutic*
  • Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage* / etiology
  • Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage* / therapy
  • Hospitals
  • Humans
  • Retrospective Studies