Cognitive stimulation and cognitive results in older adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2023 Jan:104:104807. doi: 10.1016/j.archger.2022.104807. Epub 2022 Sep 6.

Abstract

Background and purpose: The lack of cognitive activity accelerates age cognitive decline. Cognitive stimulation (CS) tries to enhance cognitive functioning. The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the effects of CS on cognitive outcomes (general cognitive functioning and specific cognitive domains) in older adults (aged 65 years or older, cognitively healthy participants, or with mild cognitive impairment, or dementia).

Methods: PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science databases were examined from inception to October 2021. A total of 1,997 studies were identified in these databases, and. 33 studies were finally included in the systematic review and the meta-analysis. Raw means and standard deviations were used for continuous outcomes. Publication bias was examined by Egger's Regression Test for Funnel Plot Asymmetry and the quality assessment tools from the National Institutes of Health.

Results: CS significantly improves general cognitive functioning (mean difference=MD = 1.536, 95%CI, 0.832 to 2.240), memory (MD = 0.365, 95%CI, 0.300 to 0.430), orientation (MD = 0.428, 95%CI, 0.306 to 0.550), praxis (MD = 0.278, 95%CI, 0.094 to 0.462) and calculation (MD = 0.228, 95%CI, 0.112 to 0.343).

Conclusion: CS seems to increase general cognitive functioning, memory, orientation, praxis, and calculation in older adults.

Keywords: Cognition; Cognitively healthy elderly; Dementia; Language; Memory; Mild cognitive impairment; Orientation.

Publication types

  • Meta-Analysis
  • Systematic Review
  • Review

MeSH terms

  • Aged
  • Cognition / physiology
  • Cognitive Behavioral Therapy*
  • Cognitive Dysfunction*
  • Dementia*
  • Healthy Volunteers
  • Humans