Interactive Evidence-Based Pressure Injury Education Program for Hospice Nursing: A Quality Improvement Approach

J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2022 Sep-Oct;49(5):428-435. doi: 10.1097/WON.0000000000000911.

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this quality improvement (QI) project was to develop and implement an interactive, evidence-based pressure injury (PI) education program and evaluate the impact on frontline hospice nursing staff knowledge and practice.

Participants and setting: The QI setting was a 12-bed inpatient hospice unit in a tertiary care Veterans Affairs (VA) Medical Center in Cleveland, Ohio. Nineteen licensed and unlicensed hospice nursing staff participated in this pre-/postworkshop project.

Approach: Chart audit determined baseline PI incidence and prevalence on the inpatient hospice unit. Interviews with key leaders informed the need to develop and implement innovative PI education opportunities. A literature review determined existing standards regarding the benefits of PI education for nursing staff but did not reveal measurable targets in hospice settings. We developed a PI education intervention based on Kolcaba's Theory of Comfort framework and a Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) performance improvement model. Education was delivered in 7 workshops, lasting 2 hours each. Knowledge, practice, and comfort for inpatient hospice nursing staff were evaluated at baseline and 8 weeks following the final refresher visit. Workshop satisfaction was collected once using standard program evaluation forms after final workshop delivery.

Outcomes: We observed a significant improvement in staff PI knowledge (P = .001) and practice (P = .001) after initial workshop attendance and repeat engagement (P = .001). There was a large magnitude of effect for overall knowledge change (d = 1.04); similarly PI care planning and practice showed a large magnitude of effect and significant improvement (P = .001, d = 2.64). Staff comfort with job duties was stable with low effect size (mean 4.52, d = 0.04), and satisfaction with the workshop education was high (100% agreement with trainer effectiveness).

Implications for practice: We found that frontline hospice nursing staff knowledge and practice improved after attendance at our evidence-based PI education program. Results of this QI project have stimulated ongoing discussion on how to sustain this program in our hospice setting.

Publication types

  • Review

MeSH terms

  • Hospice and Palliative Care Nursing*
  • Humans
  • Knowledge
  • Nursing Staff*
  • Pressure Ulcer
  • Quality Improvement
  • Simulation Training*